ßÉßɱ¬ÁÏ

This website stores cookies on your computer. These cookies are used to collect information about how you interact with our website and allow us to remember your browser. We use this information to improve and customize your browsing experience, for analytics and metrics about our visitors both on this website and other media, and for marketing purposes. By using this website, you accept and agree to be bound by UVic’s Terms of Use and Protection of Privacy Policy. If you do not agree to the above, you must not use this website.

Skip to main content

Sean Calvert

  • MISt (McGill University, 2020)
  • BA (University of Nebraska at Omaha, 2017)
Notice of the Final Oral Examination for the Degree of Master of Arts

Topic

Julius Evola and Mytho-Reactionary Politics in 20th Century Italy

Department of History

Date & location

  • Wednesday, March 26, 2025
  • 2:00 P.M.
  • Clearihue Building, Room B021

Examining Committee

Supervisory Committee

  • Dr. Perry Biddiscombe, Department of History, ßÉßɱ¬ÁÏ (Supervisor)
  • Dr. Kristin Semmens, Department of History, UVic (Member)

External Examiner

  • Dr. Steven Taubeneck, Department of Philosophy, University of British Columbia

Chair of Oral Examination

  • Dr. Thomas Land, Department of Philosophy, UVic

Abstract

Italian esotericist Julius Evola (1898-1974) developed a philosophy centered on the Primordial Tradition, from which he derived a significant social and political philosophy that firmly rejected modernity, liberalism, egalitarianism, democracy, Marxism, and progress. The formation of his philosophy coincided with the rise of Fascism and National Socialism, which he unsuccessfully attempted to steer in a Traditionalist direction. His impact extended into the post-war period with Italian neofascists, who aimed to integrate aspects of Evola’s philosophy into their own. Evola’s connections with fascists, neofascists, and other far-right groups, both historically and currently, often categorize him within the fascist camp. However, a closer examination of his philosophy reveals that it is distinct and aligns with the lesser-known paradigm of political reaction, albeit as a unique strand: mytho-reaction.